人気動画速報ネット - ドラゴンボール,アニメ,らんま,プリキュア,24時間テレビ,ワンピース,ドラえもん,ed,パーマン等の人気動画を速報中 - Mishap of B-52 at Fairchild Air Force Base Washington
Search:

ドラゴンボール アニメ らんま プリキュア 24時間テレビ ワンピース ドラえもん ed パーマン op レイアース ひぐらし ウテナ メジャー yui ロードス さくら ハルヒ エヴァンゲリオン 海外版 slamdunk 北斗 ハレのちグゥ エヴァ ラブひな nana 1000 タッチ ガンダム

Mishap of B-52 at Fairchild Air Force Base Washington

̃rfITCg
̃rfITCg ̃rfITCg
̃rfITCg

Please try to keep from using vulgarities and profanity. I feel we can make our points without using profanity. I have no problem with calling the pilot a jerk, however remember there can be children viewing this thread so try to keep suitable for public. July-7-2007 As far as I know is the first time this much of the video has been made readily available to the GP when I posted this on Youtube. ;)More footage then I have seen on the net on this subject. Mishap 24 June 1994, a B-52H of the 325th Bomb Squadron, 92d Bomb Wing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1... this photograph you can see what is apparently an ejection hatch. http://img464.imageshack.us/im... photograph was shot in mid-impact with the ground. http://img464.imageshack.us/im... photographs were shot in-between the time frame that there was apparently a plasma ball from the wing clipping power lines.US air show standards are the highest, but this was a case of systemic disregard for safety. Since this crash, the bar has been set higher more enforcement and awareness.It bothers me to see some other counties still have very poor safety at major air shows. The former soviet block has had several crashes that I would consider safety neglect a factor, if not the cause.Aerobatics should not be done over crowds. Aerobatics should be kept in a safe margin away from the crowd and to some extent the flight line. I even frown on extremely low passes over crowds.Pilots and management/command should have restraint from flying planes to extreme limits at air shows. A margin / buffer zone should be between the aerobatic area and the crowd.The B-52 was just practicing; if he had crashed in a crowd at an air show the loss of life would be high. The B-52 did some low high speed passes over personnel area and flight line; if there was a failure, he could have possibly destroyed all the aircraft on the flight line (and equipment, buildings) or and killed a lot more personnel.I love aircraft and air shows and the US. I hate to see a bunch more rules, I would prefer pilots and people in charge do there best to keep things safe with knowledge, reasonable action.I think the US and many other countries have learned from this accident to take air show safety more rationally. However, a few air shows like to try to out perform other air shows with unsafe flashy showboat shows.When you push the limits you tend to exponentially increase the risks. If a pilot makes a goof or if there is a failure, with buffer zones the risk to the crowd can be minimized.---On 24 June 1994, a B-52H of the 325th Bomb Squadron, 92d Bomb Wing at Fairchild Air Force Base (AFB), Wash., crashed while preparing to land after practicing maneuvers for an air show, killing all four crewmen. The pilot in command had over a long period of time demonstrated a disregard for Air Force flying rules and regulations, and this was known by the senior commanders in the wing. No appropriate action had been taken to discipline him or rein in his noncompliant behavior.More info at http://s92270093.onlinehome.us... http://www.zoominfo.com/Search... my opinion, I would consider this pilot a superb "stick and rudder" pilot. However there is more to being a pilot and flight then "stick and rudder", in my opinion he was very poor in some aspects of safety.It's like a football player that is in excellent physical condition and physical ability, but ignores strategy and team effort. There is more to being a pilot than one aspect, just as there is more to being an athlete then a single aspect.Other good videos long videos of the same plane and pilot. Courtesy of jescates http://youtube.com/watch?v=UJb... http://youtube.com/watch?v=hWU...

Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am
Author: ATFSCrash

Length: 09:59
Rating: 4.29
Views: 2215920

Tags: Aerobatics  AFB  Air  B-52  Base  Bomber  Bud  Crash  CRM  Fairchild  Force  Holland  Mishap  Safety  Show  Stratofortress  USAF  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

ATFSCrash (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
Masherbrum: As far as being 3 feet above the ground, thats quite possible to; but that is the least conservative estimate. It was almost certainly 30 feet or less. It was definitely not sane. Sorry but you havent proved yourself to be any more accurate than Wikipedia.
ATFSCrash (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
Masherbrum: That is speculation. Though it is a definite possibility. The government has not confirmed or denied the allegations. There are some hardened and guarded storage facilities in that area, as virtually all military installations; that doesnt necessarily mean they have nukes. ;) People in the know, wouldnt talk of such things. Youre obviously full of hot air.
jadeeatx (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
I would never gone on a commercial plane with that man, as a fellow passenger even. You cant punish an aircraft like that. Especially when they are not built for it.
Masherbrum (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
There was restricted airspace behind the control tower. Nuclear weapon storage at that.Bud Holland called one of his crew a "pussy" for grabbing the controls when he was about 3 ft. above the ridge line at Yakima in March of 94. He was reckless and should have been long grounded given his track record. Wikipedia has so many glaring errors, to even cite it "as a source" is laughable.
Mirage2000H (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
The pilot was flying as if he wanted to crash...
jimmybob116 (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
2 years 2 days ago this video was added
baconsandwich2007 (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
That's true. But most people learn from their mistakes. This guy was lucky with his stupid stunts and then, like most things, it ran out. It's the crew I feel sorry for.
steveshreds (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
to be honest, as skilled pilot as he was, i dont think he should be piloting an aircraft of that airframe that low. a bomber is ment for long distance flights, not tricky little turns.
33vortex (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
Why would you want to fly like that with an a/c clearly not designed for it? It's asking for trouble. There are planes built for aerobatics, clearly the B-52 is not one of them. It doesn't even have proper ailerons for crying out loud. This is some of the most retarded flying I've seen. From a safety point of view it should never have been allowed to continue for this long. It did, and it happened.
ATFSCrash (January 1, 1970 at 8:59 am)
Thebean38: There are six ejection seats on this model of B-52. Some of the early models did not have any. These ejection systems were not designed to be used under these conditions/parameters. The altitude is too low and the bank angle is too steep; its outside of the parameters. The likelihood of survival at that altitude and bank is better than nothing but virtually nil. The copilot started ejection sequence, the Hatch cleared but there wasnt enough time for the seat to clear.
Special thanks:YouTube Life

人気動画速報ネット - ドラゴンボール,アニメ,らんま,プリキュア,24時間テレビ,ワンピース,ドラえもん,ed,パーマン等の人気動画を速報中 © 2008 All Rights Reserved.